>>by four Palestinian
> Islamic Terrorists - see: www.americanmemorialsite.com/
>
>
> WAKE UP CALL!....for those who still don't get it.
>
>
> Subject: Dr. Vernon Chong, Major General, USAF, Retired
> From a friend:
>
> Hi --- For what it's worth......I've read, and then re-read every word in >the note below, and believe it's one of the very few letters I've ever >received that merit forwarding......
> This is the most cogent and powerful essay on the threat of Islamic >terrorism I have seen. Dr. Vernon Chong is without a doubt the most >articulate and convincing writing I have read regarding the War in Iraq .
> If you have any doubts please open your mind to his essay and give it >a fair
> evaluation. It's also eerily applicable to other current issues such as >Iran 's nuclear program, immigration, NAFTA's impact on American jobs, >trade deficits, etc.. I had no idea who Dr. Chong is, or the source of >these thoughts, so when I received them I almost deleted them, as well- >written as
> they are. But then I did a Google search on the Doctor and found him to >be a retired Air Force surgeon and past commander of Wilford Hall Medical
> Center in San Antonio . If you would like to see who this fellow is, go >to this Air Force web site and look him up:
> http://www.af.mil/bios/bio.
> ---------------------
>
> Subject: Muslims, terrorist and the USA : A different spin on Iraq war:
>
> This WAR is for REAL!
> Dr. Vernon Chong, Major General, USAF, Retired
> To get out of a difficulty, one usually must go through it. Our country >is now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as we know it, that >we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII).
> The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there are >very few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even fewer who >realize
> what losing really means.
> First, let's examine a few basics:
> 1. When did the threat to us start?
> Many will say September 11, 2001. The answer as far as the United >States is
> concerned is 1979, 22 years prior to September 2001, with the following
> attacks on us:
> * Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979;
> * Beirut , Lebanon Embassy 1983;
> * Beirut , Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983;
> * Lockerbie , Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York 1988;
> * First New York World Trade Center attack 1993;
> * Dhahran , Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military complex 1996;
> * Nairobi , Kenya US Embassy 1998;
> * Dares Salaam , Tanzania US Embassy 1998;
> * Aden, Yemen USS Cole 2000;
> * New York World Trade Center 2001;* Pentagon 2001.
> (Note that during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 >terrorist attacks worldwide).
> 2. Why were we attacked?
> Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms. The attacks >happened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, >Clinton and Bush 2. We cannot fault either the Republicans or Democrats as >there were no provocations by any of the presidents or their immediate >predecessor,
> President Ford.
> 3. Who were the attackers?
> In each case, the attacks on the US were carried out by Muslims!
> 4. What is the Muslim population of the World?
> 25%.
> 5. Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?
> Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that the >predominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under the >dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Christian, ?), that made no >difference. You either went along with the administration or you were >eliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis for
> political reasons (including 7,000 Polish priests).
> (see http://www.Nazis.testimony.co.
> Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis, as >the
> six million holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom heard >of
> anything other than the Jewish atrocities. Although Hitler kept the >world focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy about killing anyone who got >in his way of exterminating the Jews or of taking over the world - German, >Christian or any others.
> Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the world on the US , but >kill all in the way -- their own people or the Spanish, British, French or >anyone
> else. The point here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no
> protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims >there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim >leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing -- by their own >pronouncements -- killing all of us "infidels." I don't blame the peaceful >Muslims. What would you do if the choice was shut up or die?
> 6. So who are we at war with?
> There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the >Muslim terrorists. Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizing >this conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win if you don't >clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting.
> So with that background, now to the two major questions:
> 1. Can we lose this war?
>
> 2. What does losing really mean?
>
> If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions:
> We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, the >major
> reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the answer >to
> the second question - What does losing mean?
> It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means >hanging our heads, bringing the troops home and going on about our >business, like post-Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get.
> What losing really means is:
> We would no longer be the premier Country in the world. The attacks >will not subside, but rather will steadily increase. Remember, they want >us dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not >have produced an increasing series of attacks against us, over the past 18 >years.
> The plan was, clearly, for terrorists to attack us until we were >neutered and submissive to them.
> We would, of course, have no future support from other nations, for fear >of
> reprisals and for the reason that they would see; we are impotent and >cannot help them.
> They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time. It >will be increasingly easier for them. They already hold Spain hostage. It >doesn't
> matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw its troops >from Iraq . Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed their train >and told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else they want Spain to do >will be done. Spain is finished.
> The next will probably be France . Our one hope on France is that they >might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are finished >too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without us. However, >it may already be too late for France . France is already 20% Muslim and >fading fast!
> Without our support Great Britain will go too. Recently I read that >there are more mosques in England than churches.
> If we lose the war, our production, income, exports and way of life >will all
> vanish as we know it. After losing, who would trade or deal with us if >they were threatened by the Muslims. If we can't stop the Muslim >terrorists, how could anyone else?
> The radical Muslims fully know what is riding on this war, and >therefore are completely committed to winning, at any cost. We better >know it too and be likewise committed to winning at any cost.
> Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing? Simple. >Until we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and really put 100% >of our thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is going to take that >100% effort to win.
> So, how can we lose the war?
> Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war by "imploding." That >is, defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and their >purpose, and really digging in and lending full support to the war effort. >If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. If we continue to be >divided, there is no way that we can win!
> Let me give you a few examples of how we simply don't comprehend the >life
> and death seriousness of this situation.
> President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation.
> Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men >between
> 17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow profiling. >Does that sound like we are taking this thing seriously? This is war! For >the duration, we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights to >which we have become accustomed. We had better be prepared to lose some of >our civil rights temporarily or we will most certainly lose all of them >permanently.
> And don't worry that it is a slippery slope. We gave up plenty of >civil rights during WWII, and immediately restored them after the victory >and in fact added many more since then.
> Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before him?
> No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our >Political Correctness, and all of our civil rights during this conflict and >have a
> clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words apply to war. Get >them
> out of your head.
> Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or the >Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to see us >lose.
> I think some actually do, I hasten to add that this isn't because >they are disloyal. It is because they just don't recognize what losing >means.
> Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we >are divided and weakening. It concerns our friends, and it does great >damage to
> our cause.
> Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the politicians and media >regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war, perhaps exemplifies best >what I am saying. We have recently had an issue, involving the treatment >of a few Muslim prisoners of war, by a small group of our military police.
> These are the type prisoners who just a few months ago were throwing >their own people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their >tongues and otherwise murdering their own people just for disagreeing with >Saddam Hussein!
> And just a few years ago these same type prisoners chemically killed >400,000
> of their own people for the same reason. They are also the same type of >enemy fighters, who recently were burning Americans, and dragging their
> charred corpses through the streets of Iraq . And still more recently, >the same type of enemy that was and is providing videos to all news sources
> internationally, of the beheading of American prisoners they held.
> Compare this with some of our press and politicians, who for several >days have thought and talked about nothing else but the "humiliating" of >some Muslim prisoners - - not burning them, not dragging their charred >corpses through the streets, not beheading them, but "humiliating" them.
> Can they be for real?
> The politicians and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the >Secretary
> of Defense. If this doesn't show the complete lack of comprehension and
> understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are fighting, the life >and
> death struggle we are in and the disastrous results of losing this war, >nothing can.
> To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this >prisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome burned -- >totally oblivious to what is going on in the real world. Neither we, nor >any other country, can survive this internal strife. Again I say, this >does not mean
> that some of our politicians or media people are disloyal. It simply >means
> that they are absolutely oblivious to the magnitude of the situation we >are in and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushing us, for many >years.
> These people are a serious and dangerous liability to the war effort. >We
> must take note of who they are and get them out of office. Remember, >the
> Muslim terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels! That translates >into ALL non-Muslims -- not just in the United States , but throughout the >world.
> We are the last bastion of defense.
> We have been criticized for many years as being 'arrogant.' That charge >is valid. We are arrogant in that we believe that we are so good, powerful >and smart, that we can win the hearts and minds of all those who attack us, >and that with both hands tied behind our back, we can defeat anything bad >in the world! We can't!
> If we don't recognize this, our nation as we know it will not survive, >and no other free country in the world will survive if we are defeated.
> And finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allow >freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the >press, equal rights for anyone -- let alone everyone, equal status or any >status for women, or that have been productive in one single way that >contributes to the good of the world.
> This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war >or we will be equated in the history books to the self- inflicted fall of >the Roman Empire . If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history >books to be written or read.
> If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the >Muslims take over France in the next 5 years or less. They will continue >to increase the Muslim population of France and continue to encroach little >by little, on the established French traditions.
> The French will be fighting among themselves, over what should or >should not be done, which will continue to weaken them and keep them from >any united resolve. Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?
> Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some >external
> military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away, politically >correct piece by politically correct piece.
> And they are giving those freedoms away to those who have shown, >worldwide that they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even to >themselves, once they are in power.
> Muslims have universally shown that when they have taken over, they >then start brutally killing each other over whom will be the few who >control the masses.
> What is happening in Iraq is a good example. Will we ever stop hearing >from
> the politically correct, about the "peaceful Muslims".
> I close on a hopeful note, by repeating what I said above. If we are >united, there is no way that we can lose. I hope now, after the election, >the factions in our country will begin to focus on the critical situation >we are in, and will unite to save our country. It is your future we are
> talking about! Do whatever you can to preserve it. I reiterate. A >national election is months away.
> After reading the above, we all must do this not only for ourselves, but >our children, our grandchildren, our country and the world. Whether >Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal and that includes the >Politicians and media of our country and the free world!
> Please forward this to any you feel may want, or NEED to read it. Our >"leaders" in Congress ought to read it, too. There are those that find >fault with our country, but it is obvious to anyone who truly thinks >through this, that we must UNITE!
> Lastly, I wish to add: At the risk of offending someone, I sincerely >think that anyone who rejects this as just another political rant, or >doubts the seriousness of this issue or just deletes it without sending it >on, is part of the problem. Let's quit laughing at and forwarding the >jokes and
> cartoons which denigrate and ridicule our leaders in this war against >terror. They are trying to protect the interests and well being of the US >and it's citizens. Best we support them.
> GOD BLESS AMERICA !
>
>
> Jerry Fleming
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment